Google Scholar Citations of Vice Chancellor (VC) Candidates of Tribhuvan University

Citations of the Research work of Vice-Chancellor (VC) Candidates of Tribhuvan University (TU) in Google Scholar." It lists the names of Vice-Chancellor (VC) candidates for Tribhuvan University (TU) along with their Google Scholar citations, their subject of expertise, and former or current positions.

Here is the detailed content of the table:

HoD stands for Head of Department, TUSC is Tribhuvan University Service Commission, and VC stands for Vice-Chancellor.

1. Citation Count Distribution: There is a wide range in the number of citations, from 21 to 5247. The citation count can be an indicator of the impact and recognition of a scholar's research work within the academic community.

2. Disciplinary Representation: Candidates come from a diverse range of disciplines, including Chemistry, Public Health, Mathematics, Engineering, Economics, and Management, among others. This variety suggests an interdisciplinary representation among the candidates.

3. Positions of Candidates: Many of the candidates have held significant academic and administrative positions such as Heads of Department (HoD), Dean, Director, Registrar, and even Vice-Chancellor. This suggests that candidates have experience in academic leadership.

4. Candidates Without Citation Data: A significant number of candidates, especially from the 17th position onwards, do not have citation data provided. This could mean several things:

   • Their research work might not be indexed on Google Scholar.
   • They may have publications under a different name or variations of their name that are not captured.
   • They may be more focused on administrative roles rather than research, hence the lower visibility on a platform like Google Scholar.

5. Top Cited Candidates: The candidates with the highest number of citations are likely to be more active or have a longer tenure in research, resulting in higher visibility and academic influence. For example, Hem Raj Pantha and Kedar Nath Ghimire, both from the field of Chemistry, have notably high citation counts, suggesting they might have made significant contributions to their field.

6. Color Coding: The color coding seems to classify candidates into three groups based on their citation counts. Candidates with higher citation counts are in blue, those with moderate counts are in red, and those with no data are in green. This color-coding can quickly convey the citation impact level of the candidates.

7. Implications for Vice Chancellor Role: While citation count is one measure of a candidate's research impact, it is not the only factor to be considered for a Vice Chancellor role. Leadership, administrative skills, strategic vision, and the ability to guide a university are also critical. The absence of citation data does not necessarily reflect a lack of qualifications for the role of Vice Chancellor.

8. Potential Biases: Citation counts can be influenced by various factors, including the field of study (some fields have naturally higher citation rates due to the number of researchers and publications), the age of the scholar (more senior scholars may have accumulated more citations over time), and publication practices (some disciplines favor books over articles, which may not be captured well in Google Scholar).

In summary, while the citation count is a useful quantitative measure of a candidate's research output and impact, it should be considered alongside qualitative assessments of the candidate's leadership abilities and potential to fulfill the role of Vice Chancellor effectively.